All articles

Sleep & Recovery

Sleep Trackers:
How They Work, How Accurate They Are and How to Use Your Sleep Data

Aevum Protocol13 min read

Millions of people now track their sleep with smartwatches, rings, fitness bands, under-mattress pads and phone apps. These devices can be useful, but it's important to understand what they can and can't measure. The gold standard for measuring sleep is polysomnography (PSG), an overnight test in a sleep laboratory that records brain waves, eye movements, muscle activity, breathing and oxygen levels. Consumer trackers don't measure brain activity. Instead, they estimate sleep from movement, heart rate, heart rate variability, breathing and skin temperature, using each company's own algorithm. The evidence is consistent: modern trackers are good at telling when you're asleep, with more than 90% of sleep periods detected correctly, and reasonably good at estimating how long you slept. They're much weaker at detecting when you're awake in bed, and at telling which sleep stage you're in. In a 2025 Belgian study of six popular devices against PSG, all detected sleep well but correctly identified only 29-52% of time spent awake, overestimated total sleep by about 6 to 40 minutes, and agreed with PSG on sleep stages only fairly to moderately. In a 2022 Australian study of six wearables, sleep-stage agreement ranged from 50% to 65%. No consumer sleep tracker can diagnose a sleep disorder, although the Apple Watch and Samsung Galaxy Watch now have regulator-authorised features that can flag possible sleep apnoea. Used well, sleep trackers help you see patterns, keep a regular schedule and spot changes over time. Used badly, they can cause anxiety about sleep, a problem doctors call "orthosomnia". This article explains how sleep trackers work, how accurate each type is, and how to use your data sensibly.

Key numbers

FindingDetail
Detecting sleep (6 devices vs PSG, 62 adults, 2025)92-96% of sleep periods correctly identified
Detecting wake (same study)Only 29-52% of awake periods correctly identified
Total sleep time (same study)Overestimated by about 6 to 40 minutes a night
Sleep-stage agreement (6 devices, 53 adults, 2022)50-65% agreement with PSG
Apple Watch sleep apnoea feature (1,448 adults)Sensitivity 66% for moderate to severe apnoea; specificity 98.5%
Sleep need for adultsAt least 7 hours a night recommended

How sleep is measured properly

Polysomnography. In a sleep laboratory, polysomnography records:

Trained technicians score every 30 seconds of the night into one of five states (see Sleep Architecture):

Other clinical tools.

How consumer sleep trackers work

Consumer trackers estimate sleep from signals they can measure, then use machine-learning algorithms trained on PSG data:

Because no consumer device measures brain waves (except some specialised EEG headbands), sleep stages are estimated, not measured.

How sleep is measured: a sleep laboratory (polysomnography) records brain waves, eye movements, muscle activity, breathing, heart rhythm and blood oxygen and measures sleep stages directly, while a consumer sleep tracker uses movement, heart rate, heart rate variability, breathing rate and skin temperature to estimate sleep stages

Types of sleep trackers

Wrist-worn watches and bands

Examples
Apple Watch, Fitbit and Google Pixel Watch, Garmin, Samsung Galaxy Watch, Polar, Withings ScanWatch, Xiaomi and Amazfit
Strengths
  • Widely used
  • Track sleep alongside activity and heart rate
Limitations
  • Must be worn snugly at night
  • Some people find them uncomfortable
  • Battery charging can mean missed nights

Rings

Examples
Oura, Samsung Galaxy Ring, Ultrahuman, RingConn
Strengths
  • Comfortable for sleep
  • Finger arteries give a strong signal for heart rate and temperature
Limitations
  • May lose signal if loose
  • Fewer independent studies for newer brands

Straps

Example
WHOOP, worn on the wrist or upper arm
Strengths
Continuous heart rate tracking with a focus on sleep, recovery and strain
Limitations
  • Subscription-based
  • Sleep-stage accuracy similar to other wearables

Nearables (not worn)

Examples
Under-mattress pads such as Withings Sleep Analyzer, bedside radar devices and smart beds
Strengths
  • Nothing to wear
  • Can track breathing and snoring
Limitations
  • Can be confused by a bed partner or pets
  • Less accurate for sleep stages in some studies

Phone apps

Examples
Apps that use the phone's microphone or motion sensors, such as SleepScore or Sleep Cycle
Strengths
  • Cheap and easy
  • Useful for recording snoring
Limitations
  • Generally less accurate for sleep stages
  • Depend on phone placement

EEG headbands

Examples
Research and consumer headbands that record brain waves
Strengths
Closest to PSG for sleep stages
Limitations
  • Less comfortable
  • Fewer consumer options
  • More expensive

What the evidence shows

Good at detecting sleep, poor at detecting wake. In a 2025 study in Sleep Advances, An-Marie Schyvens and colleagues at Antwerp University Hospital compared six devices with PSG in 62 adults, including people with suspected sleep apnoea: the Apple Watch Series 8, Fitbit Sense, Fitbit Charge 5, WHOOP 4.0, Withings ScanWatch and Garmin Vivosmart 4.

The study tested one night per person, and most participants were men with lighter skin.

Trackers often miss time spent awake: share of awake time correctly identified compared with polysomnography was 52% for Apple Watch Series 8, 49% for Fitbit Sense, 48% for Fitbit Charge 5, 40% for WHOOP 4.0, 31% for Withings ScanWatch and 29% for Garmin Vivosmart 4, while all six correctly identified 92-96% of time asleep (Schyvens et al., Sleep Advances 2025, 62 adults)

Sleep stages are the weakest point. In a 2022 study in Sensors, Dean Miller and colleagues at Central Queensland University compared six devices with PSG in 53 healthy young adults: WHOOP 3.0, Oura Ring Gen 2, Apple Watch Series 6, Garmin Forerunner 245, Polar Vantage V and Somfit (a forehead device). For sleep versus wake, all devices agreed with PSG 86-89% of the time. For sleep stages, agreement was lower: 65% for Somfit, 61% for Oura, 60% for WHOOP, 53% for Apple Watch, 51% for Polar and 50% for Garmin. The authors concluded that all six were valid for measuring sleep timing and duration but needed improvement for classifying sleep stages.

Rings and newer devices. Oura has published results from several validation studies showing around 76-79% agreement with PSG for four sleep stages and about 92-96% for sleep versus wake, but these are company-reported summaries, and independent studies have generally found lower agreement for sleep stages. Newer models of most brands are likely to perform better than older ones, but many haven't yet been independently tested.

The AASM position. The American Academy of Sleep Medicine's 2018 position statement concluded that consumer sleep technologies "cannot be utilized for the diagnosis and/or treatment of sleep disorders at this time", but may help conversations between patients and doctors when used within a proper clinical assessment.

DeviceFormMain sensors for sleepKey independent findings
Apple WatchWatchMovement, heart rate, breathingAmong the best for sleep stages in 2025 study; sleep apnoea notification feature
Fitbit and Google Pixel WatchWatch or bandMovement, heart rate, HRV, SpO2Fitbit Sense and Charge 5 among the best for total sleep time
Oura RingRingHeart rate, HRV, temperature, movement61% sleep-stage agreement (Gen 2, 2022); higher in company-reported studies
WHOOPStrapHeart rate, HRV, movement60% stage agreement (3.0, 2022); 40% wake detection (4.0, 2025)
GarminWatchMovement, heart rate, HRV, SpO2Among the weaker performers for wake and stages in both studies
Samsung Galaxy WatchWatchMovement, heart rate, SpO2Sleep apnoea feature authorised; limited independent sleep-stage data
WithingsWatch or under-mattress padMovement, heart rate, breathingScanWatch weaker for wake and stages (2025)
PolarWatchMovement, heart rate51% stage agreement (2022)

Sleep apnoea features

Obstructive sleep apnoea, in which the airway repeatedly narrows or closes during sleep, is common and often undiagnosed (see Sleep Apnea). It's linked to high blood pressure, heart disease, stroke, type 2 diabetes, accidents and daytime sleepiness. Two smartwatch features have now been authorised by the US FDA to flag possible sleep apnoea:

These features are screening tools, not diagnoses. They miss many people with apnoea, especially moderate cases, so no notification doesn't mean you don't have sleep apnoea. If you snore loudly, stop breathing or gasp during sleep, or feel very sleepy during the day, see a doctor whatever your tracker says.

Sleep scores and readiness scores

Most trackers combine sleep duration, timing, stages, heart rate, HRV and other data into a single "sleep score" or "readiness score". Each company calculates these differently, and the formulas aren't public or standardised. A score of 80 on one device doesn't mean the same as 80 on another. Scores can be motivating, but they're best used as a rough guide to your own trends, not as an objective measure of sleep quality.

The risk of orthosomnia

In 2017, sleep researcher Kelly Glazer Baron and colleagues described patients who became so focused on achieving "perfect" tracker data that it worsened their sleep. They called it orthosomnia. Some patients spent longer in bed trying to raise their sleep totals, which can actually worsen insomnia. One trusted her tracker's verdict of poor sleep over a laboratory test showing she'd slept well. As Baron put it, "They are not able to differentiate between light and deep sleep." If checking your sleep data makes you anxious, take a break from it.

What sleep trackers measure well and what they don't: good for detecting when you're asleep and sleep timing and regularity; moderate for total sleep time and overnight heart rate and HRV trends; poor for detecting time awake in bed and deep, light and REM stages; not suitable for diagnosing sleep disorders or comparing scores between brands

Why this matters for longevity

Sleep is one of the foundations of healthy ageing. Short and irregular sleep are linked to higher risk of heart disease, type 2 diabetes, depression, dementia and early death, and adults need at least seven hours a night (see Sleep Duration and Longevity). Sleep trackers can help by showing how much and how regularly you sleep, and by highlighting the effects of late caffeine, alcohol, screens, travel and stress. They work best as tools for building habits and spotting changes, combined with how you actually feel. They can't replace a medical assessment for sleep problems. The same caution applies to other wearable numbers (see Resting Heart Rate and HRV and Fitness Tracker Calories).

When to see a doctor about your sleep

Regardless of what your tracker shows, see a doctor if you have:

Recommendations by situation

SituationWhat to do
Want to improve sleep habitsUse a tracker to monitor sleep duration and regularity; focus on weekly trends
Interested in sleep stagesTreat stage data as a rough estimate; don't chase specific deep or REM targets
Feel anxious about your sleep dataTake a break from tracking; focus on how you feel during the day
Snoring, gasping or very sleepy in the daySee a doctor; a tracker can't rule out sleep apnoea
Received a sleep apnoea notificationArrange a proper sleep study through your doctor
Ongoing insomniaSee a doctor; cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is the first-line treatment
Shift worker or frequent travellerUse tracking to see patterns in timing and duration; plan regular sleep windows
Choosing a devicePick one that's comfortable to wear all night; for wake and stage data, no device is clearly best

Practical notes

Wear your device snugly and consistently, charge it during the day, and keep your profile accurate. Look at weekly averages and trends rather than individual nights, and compare the numbers with how rested you actually feel. Use your data to test changes, such as an earlier bedtime, less evening caffeine or alcohol, or a consistent wake time, and see what helps. Don't spend extra time in bed just to improve your score. If you have symptoms of a sleep disorder, see a doctor rather than relying on your tracker. Our Longevity Doctors review sleep alongside heart, metabolic and brain health in every assessment and can help you interpret your sleep data and arrange further testing if needed, starting with the free longevity assessment.

References
  1. Schyvens AM, et al. A performance validation of six commercial wrist-worn wearable sleep-tracking devices for sleep stage scoring compared to polysomnography. Sleep Advances, 2025;6(2):zpaf021.
  2. Miller DJ, Sargent C, Roach GD. A validation of six wearable devices for estimating sleep, heart rate and heart rate variability in healthy adults. Sensors, 2022;22(16):6317.
  3. Khosla S, et al. Consumer sleep technology: an American Academy of Sleep Medicine position statement. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 2018;14(5):877-880.
  4. Baron KG, et al. Orthosomnia: are some patients taking the quantified self too far? Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 2017;13(2):351-354.
  5. Apple. Sleep apnea notifications on Apple Watch. September 2024.
  6. Oura. How Oura measures sleep and validates accuracy.

Free longevity assessment

How does your sleep
score on your longevity assessment?

Take the free Aevum Protocol assessment to see how your sleep & recovery and 6 other longevity domains are performing — and get a personalised 90-day plan.

Take the free assessment